Services · Agentic & Web3

Autonomous agents you can audit, and a regulatory position that holds.

Nobody needs to explain what an agent is to you. You need someone to make it verifiable, monitored, and defensible in front of a regulator or an investor.

Blockchain startups · DAOs · protocols · Crypto Valley

What you get

  • Autonomous agents under mandate: perimeter, spending limits, emergency stop
  • Security review and invariant monitoring in production
  • Timestamped audit trail usable in regulatory review
  • Machine-to-machine payment rails (x402, agent identity standards) where the use case justifies it

Concrete examples

  • Continuous protocol monitoring with human escalation on threshold
  • Regulatory watch agent and report preparation
  • Treasury operations automated under dual approval
  • Technical compliance documentation for due diligence
Frequently asked

What people ask me before signing.

How do we hold Swiss compliance?

A map of applicable obligations (FINMA, AMLA, revised FADP), documentation of automated decisions, and a usable audit trail. I am not your lawyer: I produce the technical material your legal counsel needs, in a form they can work with.

What about smart contract security?

Code review, invariant monitoring in production, and alerts on anomalous behaviour. Active participation in public audit contests — reports available as references on request.

Our reputation cannot absorb an incident.

That's precisely the argument for traceability: when something goes wrong, the difference between a crisis and a contained incident is your ability to show a timestamped record of what was proposed, executed and approved.

Are you pushing a token or an in-house protocol?

No. No token integration, no wallet to connect, no investment product. You pay for a service in Swiss francs, with an invoice.

Our method

Real log extract

The prepared / observed / verified grid is our internal standard. It separates what the system intended to do, what it did, and what a human checked. That is what makes an automation defensible.

Choose an example
Thursday 06.08 · today's boxes 38 boxes
Prepared · 07:12

38 boxes composed from today's harvest, 2 substitutions proposed (fennel → chard).

Observed · 07:14

38 delivery notes printed, 4 client emails sent, 1 delivery failure reported.

Verified · 08:03

Checked and signed — substitution rejected for 1 client with an allergy, corrected by hand.

Estimated saving: 4 h 20 per week
Friday 31.07 · month-end close 52 invoices
Prepared · 06:40

52 invoices drafted from the delivery notes, 3 quantity discrepancies flagged.

Observed · 06:44

49 invoices sent, 3 held back, 1 invalid email address.

Verified · 09:15

Checked and signed — 2 discrepancies confirmed by the client, 1 corrected before sending.

Estimated saving: 6 h per month
Monday 04.08 · overdue payments 7 cases
Prepared · 08:05

7 reminders drafted, tone matched to how long the payment has been overdue. None sent.

Observed · 08:31

5 reminders sent after your approval, 2 set aside at your request.

Verified · 08:34

Checked and signed — 1 client in dispute removed from the list before sending.

Estimated saving: 2 h per month
This is the only thing I sell: you see what the agent proposed, what it actually did, and who signed off on it.

The assessment is free and commits you to nothing.

Forty-five minutes, a written map of what can be automated in your business, and a number. What you do with it is up to you.